The Premise of the Second
Amendment
a letter by
Harley L. Sachs
All this imbroglio about gun control and gun ownership
justified by the Second Amendment misses the essential condition: “In order to
establish a well-regulated militia…” None of those gun owners are members of a
well regulated militia. The Second Amendment was created at a time when
memories of colonists under an oppressive foreign government were still fresh
and there was a need for resistance. This has been extrapolated by the NRA into
a fear that our own government will take away our guns.
Some will argue that the states already have a
militia, which is the National Guard under the control of the governors, but
the Federal Government has the authority to mobilize the National Guard, and
has sent our state armies to foreign lands to fight. The National Guard, then,
cannot be construed as a militia to protect us from our own government.
What the Constitution appears to enable is a home
guard. We have no home guard, and we have no well regulated militia. Being part
of the official militia should be a condition for ownership of military-style
firearms.
No comments:
Post a Comment