Friday, November 22, 2013

"A Tree Sees..." (an occasional poem)

Tom Wright celebrated his 93rd birthday November 22. He often publishes a poem about his window on the world and the tree he watches out his window. Here is a conceit with the tree watching him back:

A Tree Sees…
Behind its leaves

Into the windows that squint out upon the world,
Through bifocals, trifocals, and cataracts.
Theirs are the heroic faces of the septuagenarians,
the octogenarians,
and the merely elderly
but not yet old.
Not old like the tree that watches,
the observant tree,
whose life cycle has its own seasonal rhythm and perspective.
The human animals come and go.

The trees, stoic, rooted, stand fast and watch.

Monday, November 18, 2013

How Obama screwed up on the ACA

Aside from the 56 million paid to an incompetent foreign web design company to set up the ACA log on system, Obama messed up by omitting two simple words when he promised people they could keep their old health plan if they liked it. Those words were "if legal."
Anyone with the sense to read the provisions of the ACA should know that certain provisions made some old policies illegal, like not covering preexisting conditions, like putting a lifetime cap on coverage, like not including maternity benefits, not providing for annual examinations, etc. Failing to live up to those ACA provisions makes an old policy illegal under the law. But people don't read their own policies and don't pay attention.

Politically savvy readers will realize the passage of the ACA with the cooperation of lobbyists from insurance companies, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies was possible because they were promised a pool of 47 million new customers, many subsidized by the US government. Who could pass up that deal? So it passed, barely.
Now the insurance companies are scrambling to cash in and the melee is causing confusion and anger.  Eventually the public will say, "Screw the insurance companies! We want Medicare for all." Then we will finally have a single payer plan.
In Denmark where I have access to the tax forms being a potential payer of Danish income taxes I see they have a 5% income tax for health, just as we have a Social Security tax. That pays the so-called premiums for health in Denmark. So why can't we be that smart?

Monday, September 30, 2013

Dear Solicitor:

Harley  L.  Sachs
2545 SW Terwilliger Blvd. Apt. 328
Portland, OR 97201

Dear Solicitor,

Your invitation and information have arrived here and been given careful, thoughtful consideration. As you are no doubt aware, nowadays we get a great number of offers and requests. What we have to do is put them in perspective in consideration of our own financial limitations.  What we are prepared to do is make a counter offer.
I am Harley Sachs, a professionally published author for more than fifty-five years. I retired from teaching in1986 and in the years since have published more than thirty books ranging from memoirs and short stories, to serious novels and mystery “entertainments.” In that long career I have never begged for donations or applied for grants. I am not now asking for money from you, either.
It is important to support the arts, not only the visual arts, but the art of the written word, for little has more staying power over the centuries than the book. However, being an author is a tough business. Thanks to the digitizing of entire libraries, an American author today is in direct competition with every other author who ever lived whose works are published in English.
The only way you can significantly support this author is to buy a book. I do not personally sell books. I do not have the capital or the space for an inventory of printed copies. I depend on my vendors, such as Amazon.com, B&N, and lulu.com for actual sales.
If you’d like to have the personal satisfaction of having supported an elderly American author in poor health, this is your opportunity. Take a careful look at the enclosed list. Visit one of the vendors and read a free sample. I know you will find a title you will enjoy. The price is right. Some are priced under $3.00! How can you go wrong?


                                     Harley L. Sachs

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

Disclose or not discose?



When you download a new computer program or upgrade, you have to first agree to the terms of the contract. By clicking on “I agree.”  you are bound to its terms, though you can bow out by canceling all use of the product. Hidden in that fine print no one reads is a clause that says you agree not to use the program for unlawful purposes, a long list of which is usually spelled out. The point is, if there is illegality involved, the contract is void. In case of a dispute or lawsuit about damages yada yada yada there is usually an agreement to binding arbitration.
Business contracts often use agreements of confidentiality to protect proprietary information, patents and such. The same goes for other contracts, but here’s where it gets sticky. What if you contract with an organization that then, unbeknownst to you, engages in criminal activity? Surely you should elect to bow out to avoid culpability and liability. You could be swept up as a co-conspirator.
But what if that organization that has sworn you to secrecy is a government agency that is involved with criminal activity? Are you bound by your signature to hold to the contractual terms? That’s the dilemma faced by whistle blowers like Ellserg, Manning and Snowden who exposed the illegal activity of government agencies.
Violations of the Geneva Convention, assassinations, torture, and violations of the 4th Amendment against unlawful search and seizure are crimes the government seeks to conceal behind the Official Secrets Act.  So for speaking out are those men criminals, conscientious citizens, traitors or heroes?

Monday, August 12, 2013

Breaking the Code of Silence


MS# 1697silence/760 words
August 12, 2013


Breaking the Code of Silence
a column by
Harley L. Sachs

If you observe a crime being committed, what is your responsibility? When we watched apparent drug deals going town in the house across the street, we notified the police. That was our responsibility. If you are a witness to a crime and refuse to speak out, you are sheltering the criminals and are complicit in their crimes. You become willing co-conspirators. Should you withhold evidence, like the two friends of the Boston bomber who threw away his laptop and backpack, you are obstructing justice and may go to prison.
Of course, if the criminals in your neighborhood are likely to kill you for speaking out,   what do you do then? Keep silent and reinforce their authority to continue to commit crimes? Or take your chances and possibly end up dead or in the Witness Protection Program, WITSEC, forced to take a new identity and live in a distance place along with an estimated 40,000 other hidden witnesses?
But what if the criminal acts you have observed are committed by your own government? Who do you turn to? That’s the dilemma faced by Manning and Snowden. Manning turned to Wikileaks. Snowden went to the press. In the days of Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers in the Vietnam War, the information was turned over to the New York Times. Ellsberg went to prison.
Breaking the code of silence has consequences. If you are a Mafioso and rat someone out, your body may be found in the trunk of a stolen car abandoned in the long term lot of the airport. If you have sworn to the Government Secrets Act you may go to prison or even, possibly executed if your acr is determined to be treason.
So when is a crime not a crime? Are the victims of the Boston bombers, killed or maimed simply “collateral damage” And how are they different from the women and children killed in a house struck by a drone flying over Pakistan? In the case of the Boston bombers, they constructed and brought their pressure cooker bombs to the crowd and set them off. In the case of the drone strikes, the anonymous persons who launched the smart bombs and missiles were thousands of miles away, sitting safely on our soil.
We are not at war with Pakistan or Yemen. Their air space is sovereign territory, just as the air space over New York is ours. To fly over a foreign country and launch bombs and missiles is an act of war. To aim those weapons at approximately specific alleged targets is assassination, another name for murder.
In the case of our calling the police about the drug deals going on across the street our recourse was our dependence on law and order and the Constitution. If we had no law and order, as is the case in Iraq where those essential parts of a civilized society have broken down or are non-existent, the alternative is revenge. Hence the frequent car bombings intended to terrify and cow the neighbors into silence or submission, just as our neighborhood gang of Mafioso hope to achieve through intimidation.
So now we have Manning and Snowden who both signed the Umberto Code of Silence  known as the National Secrets Act and then observed what they interpreted as crimes. If the criminal acts are committed by your own government, who do you turn to?
Whether you believe him or not, President Obama has said he had already taken steps to reign in the excesses of surveillance by the NSA, violations of the Constitution rules against unlawful search and seizure, issues which were our grounds for the Revolutionary War against the British Empire. Obama claims Snowden’s public revelation simply hastened the changes.
The dilemma remains. Whoever fired the drone missiles and killed those innocents are removed only by miles and intent from the drunken soldier who burst into homes in the middle of the night and murdered children in their beds.  The anonymous drone “pilots” will not be charged, but they generally pay a price of guilty conscience and PTSD for what they have done. They have to live with themselves. Some cannot and commit suicide out of remorse for what they have done and the people they have killed..
But the issue remains of who do you turn to to report a crime committed by your own government? The United Nations? A complicit Congress that voted in favor like the Nazi government who passed the Nuremberg Laws that made genocide of Jews legal?
Are we all guilty for remaining silent?

Thursday, July 4, 2013

A Stain on the Congress



With 90% of the American public in favor of background checks for would-be firearm purchasers, the failure of our government to pass such a requirement is a betrayal of the public interest and a stain on the integrity of our representatives.

Since the Newtown massacre of school children and their teachers there have been more then six thousand victims of firearm violence in this country. Here in Oregon we have more deaths from firearms than from automobile accidents. Think about it.

Though anyone can buy an automobile, in order to drive it off your own property you must pass a driver’s test and have a license. Yet without background checks any idiot with the cash can buy a deadly weapon. God help us.

It may not be obvious to you, but this country is the largest manufacturer and exporter of weapons in the world. The military-industrial complex Eisenhower warned us about has taken over. Arms companies sponsor the NRA. With their contributions to the election campaigns of our representatives it sure looks like they are owned by the gun makers. They have sold their souls in order to be reelected. The Senate is so bound up by partisan bickering and conflict that no one wants to run for office. It reminds me of the last days of Rome described by Gibbon in his “Decline and Fall.” In those days it wasn’t the weapons makers who were the cause, but the fact that people ran for the Roman Senate in order to glean all they could from the system before they were poisoned. No one worth his salt would run.

It’s time that congress stood up for the safety of Americans they represent by supporting sensible background checks for firearm purchasers. 

Friday, June 21, 2013

A cautionary tale for American Muslims

The United States has a sad history of racism and intolerance that may be repeated if we are not vigilant.
Remember, the so-called New World was colonized for two purposes: for gold and to convert the indigenous peoples to Christianity.The Spanish conquerors made every effort to obliterate all traces of the previous cultures and religions.
As the new United States expanded westward, native peoples were displaced and even slaughtered. One tribe was hunted like animals until none remained.Surviing native American Indians had their children taken from them and put in missionary schools to convert them to Christianity and eliminate their native habits, language, and religion.
When the Chinese laborers came for the Gold Rush and to build the trans-continental railway, they were eventually expelled for fear of the "yellow peril."
The United States was one of the last countries to officially abolish slavery and indentured servitude, though the latter still exists in sweat shops and aur pair girls. 
The Mormons were persecuted and had to flee to the west and settle in Utah.
At the outbreak of World War II Japanese-Americans were interred in concentration camps.
Today thousands of so-called illegal immigrants are being reported and held in camps pending their expulson.
Now, since the 9/11 attack by fifteen Muslims, chiefly from Saudi Arabia, he country is at war against Muslim extremists, using drones flying over countries we are not at war with to assassinate alleged terrorists. Each so-called "collateral damage" of innocents adds to the recruitment of others seeking revenge.
Given that history, it is essential that all American Muslims speak out against terrorism and identify potential bombers. The risk is that besides being spied upon by FBI informants, we might see an American repeat of the Nazi Nurenberg Laws.